HMのブログ

思ったままを気ままに書きます。

QLE.co.jp

広告

※このエリアは、60日間投稿が無い場合に表示されます。記事を投稿すると、表示されなくなります。

記事のタイトルを入力してください(必須)

2013-10-14 11:03:59 | Weblog
Problem ID: Financial Difficulties of the U.S. Government.

Issues:
In order to solve financial difficulties, we basically have two simple options as follows:

1. Increase revenues=tax incomes.
2. Reduce expenses.

Right now, U.S. Government has not been successful in collecting full amount of taxes against Earth Incs. Since we do not have Earth Government yet, Earth Incs are taking advantage of global presence when paying taxes in a way of choosing tax heaven countries.

Recommendation:
- Incorporate a concept of U.S. citizenship for corporations in the U.S. in order to differentiate them based on tax payment status.
1. Corporations of U.S. Citizenship status.
2. Corporations of Green Card status.
3. Non-residence.

If U.S. government classifies Earth Incs as Green card status since they are avoiding paying full amount of U.S. taxes, U.S. government can give them dis-incentive for avoiding full amount of U.S. tax payment.

For example, restriction on Lobbying Activities:

U.S. government can make Lobbying Activities of Green card status companies such as Earth Incs’ as secondary importance while placing primary importance to those of U.S. citizenship status companies.

In other words, this is a threat or punishment for not paying full amount U.S. taxes, which we need to overcome financial difficulties right now.

コメント
この記事をはてなブックマークに追加

ファンドマネーの規制・解体

2013-06-06 17:08:26 | Weblog
ファンドマネーが巨大化し、価格影響力だけでなく市場影響力を持つまでになりました。

本来であれば、経済学で独占・寡占状態にあたるので、戦後日本での財閥解体のごとく、影響力を下げて、「経済の見えざる手」が働き始めるようにするのが妥当です。

残念ながら、もともとアメリカ発の問題であり、アメリカが金融市場で金儲けをしようとした苦し紛れの策であるため、アメリカが同意せず、おそらく実現できないでしょう。


英ファンド大幅損失
「一週刊で6%減、日本株安など響く」「運用資産は約1兆6千億円」(日経6月6日夕刊)

英ファンド一つで1兆6千億円。

アメリカ・ファンドもたくさんありますね!

おそらく、ファンド一つで数千億円の巨額のお金をクリック一つで右から左へ、日本の外から中へ。


今回の件は、この英ファンドが逃げ遅れて大損失。

確か日経平均で13%以上下げていますね!


これからも明らかなように、金融市場はすでにファンドマネーの独占・寡占状態です。


地球レベルの問題なので、日本単体ではおそらく規制をかけられないでしょう。


ただし、アメリカ・ファンド対策の名案が一つだけあります。

それは、短期的な利益・利ザヤを挙げさせないこと。


常に、長期的展望で政策を行う、2~3年かけてじわじわゆっくり行うことです。


つまり、急激なマネー供給の増加をせず、じわじわゆっくり2~3年かけてマネー供給量を少しずつ増やしていくこと。


必ず、彼らの予算・設定目標よりも低い成長目標で甘んじることです。


彼らは、システム上短期的成果を追及せざるを得ないので、長期的な徐々でゆっくりした利益を追求できない環境で働いています。


以上、よろしくお願いいたします。

http://www.qle.co.jp/earth7.htm


コメント (2)
この記事をはてなブックマークに追加

穴がミックス アナノミックス アベノミックス

2013-06-01 15:43:09 | Weblog
国レベルで経済理論をあてはまると穴が開いていることに気付くと思います。
経済のグローバル化により、閉鎖的環境が保てず、理論がそのまま使えないということです。

穴の開いたバケツに水を注ぐようなものです。

例えば、マネー供給量を増やせば、お金が潤沢になり、経済が循環し始める。

現状では必ずしもそうではありません。

穴が開いていれば、水は流れ出てしまうからです。

その一つの要因はファンドマネーです。

おそらく複数のファンドマネーが動けば、何兆円という単位のお金が瞬時にクリック一つで投資資金を海外へ持ち出されます。

ちなみに、ファンドマネージャーは、99%以上がMBAで同じ教育を受けており、同じような予測を立てるので、同じ動きをする可能性が高いと思います。

今回も日銀のマネー供給量を約2年間で倍増するという発表を受けて、おそらく利ザヤを稼ぎに、海外(おそらく東南アジア・新興国)で投資していたお金を価格が上昇しないように徐々に日本に持ってきた。(日経平均8千円ぐらいのときから)

今回は5月23日の時点で1万5627円となり、利益確定で売り始めた。=海外に持ち出した。

その結果、6月1日の時点で、日経平均が1万3774円に下がった。

15627-13774/13774=約13%

この大部分はファンドマネーにもっていかれたと考えてよいと思います。

つまり、金融市場投資額の1割ぐらいの利ザヤをファンドマネーに稼がれたと考えるのが妥当だと思います。

ファンドマネーはすでに価格影響力を持っています。

ファンドのコンセプト自体がコレクティブ・パワー、スケール・メリット=量による「漁夫の利」を得ようとするもので、個人的には姑息な手段であり、容認すべきではないと思います。

個人的には、日本で財閥解体したように、ファンドマネーを解体・分割して影響力を落させるべきだと思います。

残念ながら、アメリカの大きな収入源の一つなので、アメリカが反対し実行できないような気がします。

従って、ファンドマネーをどのように規制するのかが重要になってくると思います。

さもなければ、マネー供給量を増やしてもファンドマネーにもっていかれるのが関の山です。

アメリカでの貧富の差が急激に拡大した理由もアメリカのマネー供給量の倍増とファンドマネーの関係があると思います。

ファンドマネーを規制できないのであれば、日本で急激にマネー供給量を増やすのは得策ではないと思います。

日本でお金を流してもファンドマネー(特にアメリカ)に取られるだけです。

以上、よろしくお願い申し上げます。


http://www.qle.co.jp/
コメント
この記事をはてなブックマークに追加

Current Issues and how we can solve it.

2013-05-26 13:10:12 | Weblog
Problem ID:
We need to solve both climate change issue and economic issue at the same time.

There always exists economic reason behind climate change issue.

Issues:
We have currently no control over Earth INCs and Fund Moneys, which is creating both economic and environmental issues.

Earth government, which is non-existent, needs to govern both Earth INCs and Fund Moneys.

Nothing is wrong with economic theory.

Everything is wrong with application of it.

Economic theory only works well in a nutshell environment as you know.

Right now we apply it on a nation basis, which is not a nutshell environment anymore.

However, when we apply it on Earth basis, which is a nutshell environment and thus it will work well.

Only thing we have to consider is that the assumptions of abundant resources and no limitations are still violated, which should be overcame by using the pollution model as far as I know.

If Earth Government governs both Earth INCs and Fund Moneys such as the followings, the world will become a lot better place to live with less suffering:

A. HRT (high frequency trading) is an act of cheating in my opinion or at least an un-fair practice, which currently nobody controls.
B. Because of both economic reasons and life style changes, deforestation in Amazon forests and forests in south Asia never stops, which contribute to the climate change. Mega-size hurricanes and tornados must have lots of things to do with it.

Act of high frequency trading is not acceptable based on business ethics and healthy competition in the financial market.

Only business activities aimed for ROI should be accepted including those of investors’.

HFT (high frequency trading) is just an act of shaking computer systems for the purpose of manipulating stock prices or influencing price stock prices, which unfortunately works now.

This creates unfair advantage to the Fund Money and it always wins in the financial market, which creates economic reasons for the working poor people and in the end creates necessity to cut trees or sell forests contributing to the climate change.

The main causes of deforestations are as follows:
1. Growing demands for bio-energy. (Palm tree planting by cutting trees of forests.)
2. Growing demands for meat= creating ranching space by cutting trees at rims of forests. ( Life Style Change)

Real causes are population over-growth and life style change (eating more meats).

Especially young people at developing countries imitate American life style of eating more meats through getting information via internet, TV, movies, and Fast Foods chains, etc.

Conclusions:

Earth Government needs to control population growth, activities of Earth INCs and Fund Moneys.

For now, United Nations can deal with issue of population growth in my opinion.

G20 can deal with monopolistic powers of both Earth INCs and Fund Moneys through enforcing anti-monopoly laws on them.

As for Life Style Change, only American people can become a role model = eat more vegetables and less meat, please. Otherwise, all of us will suffer including you.


http://www.qle.co.jp/
コメント
この記事をはてなブックマークに追加

Norton Internet Security 2010のバグ発見

2012-11-06 16:48:13 | Weblog
Norton Internet Security 2010でCPUメモリー・オーバーフローのバクを検出しました。

最新バージョンの2013に載せ替えて問題は解決しました。

現象は、フリーズです。

2010のままでの根本的な解決方法は、ないと思います。


無償で2013に載せ替えられますので、載せ替えておいた方が良いと思います。

ソフトの有効期限がそのまま継続されないと損をするので、シマンテックに電話して電話サポートを受けながら私はやりました。

2013の方がCPUへの負荷が断然軽くその結果早いので、今は快適です。
コメント
この記事をはてなブックマークに追加

一般個人投資家は金融市場から退散した方が良いと思います。

2012-10-15 11:47:13 | Weblog
シマンテック・ベリサインにシマンテック、ベリサインよる自社株強制・強硬・商法違反?による買い付け・回収。

シマンテック、ベリサインが一般公開買い付けによる自社株買い付けをしました。

私が購入した額の三分の一以下なので当然応じませんでした。

その後、株主総会による決議。

当然、否決で投票。

ところが多数決による決定で、自社株強制・強硬・商法違反?による買い付け・回収を強硬。

裁判所の許可がでたら・・・ということなので、裁判ざたになっているようです。

私の方は大きな損失です。

というか、いやだと拒否しているものを力ずく・無理やりに剥ぎ取り、人の恨みを買うようなことをして、今後の商売に影響するとは考えないのでしょうかねぇ?


SECの方にクレームをつけたら、「そういうこともありうる。あとは裁判で・・・」ということでした。

結論としては、個人投資家が安心して投資できるような環境にないということだと思います。
コメント
この記事をはてなブックマークに追加

From Free Economy to Conditional Free Economy

2012-07-31 11:53:41 | Weblog
From Free Economy to Conditional Free Economy

I always felt strange about using economic theory based on inappropriate assumptions.

Basic assumptions of current economic theory include such as abundant resources and no limitations, although these are no longer true.

In the past people in the West have been successful applying Free Economy based on blind-individualism.

Given that resources are no longer abundant and some limitations have been apparent because of over-population as well as globalization, I am strongly recommending Conditional Free Economy based on conditional individualism instead as follows:

1. Conditional Individualism:
2. Conditional Free Economy:

1. Conditional Individualism:
Conditional individualism means pursuing for individual benefits on the condition that it does not hurt the benefits of the whole when we confront with limitations and restrictions.

For example, drinkable water or energy is getting scarce and thus each of us should not waste water or energy, something like that.

Under the current system, it is free to waste water or energy as long as we can afford it, which hurts the benefits of the whole or the Globe.

Majority of current issues will be solved if we apply Conditional Individualism instead of blind-individualism.

2. Conditional Free Economy:

Conditional Free Economy means that we will control economy only when and where Free Economy will not work well because of violation of its assumptions.

Therefore, when and where basic assumptions are violated, the global government should intervene through use of anti-monopoly laws and regulations or setting up additional new laws and regulations.
Violation of basic assumptions:

A. Scarce natural resources:
- Oil. ( Energy)
- Drinkable Water.
- The above should be under surveillance of the global government.

B. Limitations:
Globalization actually means saturation or no more room for geographical growth or expansion.

Free Economy based on blind-individualism requires room for growth or expansion, besides some of fundamental assumptions are already violated.

We still have to avoid monopolistic conditions on global market.

Implementation:
How can we implement it?

1. At school, we should start teaching conditional individualism instead of blind-individualism. We just need to change our ethics. Individualism is acceptable as long as it does not hurt the benefits of the whole or the Globe.
2. Declare use of Conditional Free Economy based of conditional individualism instead of Free Economy based on blind-individualism.
In other words, we should update the current Economic system in accordance with changed environment.



コメント (1)
この記事をはてなブックマークに追加

これ以上の規制緩和はやめてください! 独禁法がグローバルで機能していません。

2012-07-20 17:05:05 | Weblog
No more deregulation, please!


Deregulations are good way to promote efficiency.

Pursuing economic efficiency is one of fundamental principles in economic theory, which is also inevitable based on human revolution.


However, I would like to point out the following:


1, Excessive competition through after-effect of deregulations ends up creating monopolistic market conditions.


Due to effects of both deregulations and globalization, monopolistic market conditions prevail these days in global market.


In the past, we learned that monopolistic market conditions paralyze healthy economic activities and thus anti-monopoly laws were created and have been enacted.


In other words, we can use deregulations as an accelerator and anti-monopoly laws as a brake.


Unfortunately, since we do not have a global government yet, anti-monopoly laws are not functioning well or not properly being enacted.


Therefore, right now we are stepping on an accelerator without properly using brakes.


In conclusion, we should look for both effectiveness and efficiency.


In other words, please enforce anti-monopoly laws globally. ( we need to have global anti-monopoly laws, first, I guess.)


If that is not possible, no more deregulation, please!



コメント
この記事をはてなブックマークに追加

Globalization Factor

2011-12-28 14:27:59 | Weblog
Nothing is wrong with economic theory.

Everything is wrong with our implementation of it.

I. Background:
II. Economic premises:
III. Time Lags and What we should do:
IV. Warning and My proposal:


I. Background:

Although everybody is aware of a movement of globalization, it seems to me that majority of our activities are not to the point at globalization point of view.

Therefore, I would like to point out fundamental issues with respect to current economic situations influenced by globalization factor as follows:

II. Economic premises:

As everybody is aware of it, there are fundamental premises in economic theory.

As Dr. Auerbach explained to me in Macro Economic class at UCR, economic theory only works under certain conditions.
In other words, economic theory only works as long as we keep those fundamental premises.

Since most economic theory is mathematically proven, it must work like mathematical formula on the condition that we keep the following economic premises.

Put it in different words, current mal-functioning economy is being caused by our mistakes such as violating the followings:


1. Perfect Information Flow:
2. Free Movement of Labor Force:
3. Free Movement of Exchange Rate:
4. Avoid Monopoly:

1. Perfect Information Flow:

This is the most famous one in economic theory, I guess.
Although it is not possible to have perfect information flow, we will have a serious trouble when violating it substantially.

Good example of it is Lehman Shock.

Critical information for judging value of securities got intentionally and technically hidden in a way of so-called securities science or something like that,

I am sorry for forgetting the right word for it.

It took many years until we found out what was going on and thus majority of us got mislead by the disguised information.


2. Free Movement of Labor Force:

Because of globalization factor, almost everything moves globally except labor force these days.

Since many factories moved globally, labor force is supposed to move globally too, that is not happening right now.


This is one of the reasons we have high employment rate in industrialized countries.

Young people should be able to find a job freely in global market without any restrictions such as working visa, etc.

This is also one of the reasons we have an issue for population over-growth.

In developing countries more jobs have been created without any inflow of labor force from outside, this situation creates enough room for having many babies.

On the other hand, in developed countries we have high unemployment rate because labor force are staying at home while lots of factories=jobs are moving out.


3. Free Movement of Exchange Rate:

China is controlling exchange rate.

Nobody tries to control exchange rate unfavorably to him/her.

Everybody tries to control exchange rate favorably to him/her.

Since China has the second biggest economic power, it is not acceptable to fix or control exchange rate for its favor.


4 .Avoid Monopoly:

In the past ten years or so, I tend to believe that we have increased concern for monopolistic conditions in the market.

As everybody is aware of it, when monopolistic condition exists, market does not function properly since we cannot keep fair competition due mainly to inadequate governmental regulations such as forcing global anti-monopolistic regulations.

- Monopolistic Power of Fund Money:

- Since fund money is so huge, it is no longer fair for individual investors to compete against fund money in the same financial market.

- This is one of the reasons that I quit investing in financial market anymore and also money inflow into financial market is shrinking, I guess.

- I rather play at casino than investing in financial market since it is not a fair competition.

- Monopolistic power of global companies.

- Since we do not have global government yet, nobody effectively controls monopolistic situation in global market.


III. Time Lags and what we should do about it:

In addition, we have some time lags or misconception as follows:

1. Concept of EC is already obsolete:
2. Concept of TPP is even dangerous:


1. Concept of EC is already obsolete:

Concept of EC is one step backward from concept of globalization and thus it is already obsolete.

Actually from globalization point of view, concept of EC is working as a blockage against globalization.

One of the reasons that EC’s economy is not doing very well is that it failed to fully benefit from economic boom of Asia especially China in the past several years by forming EC, which in a sense works as a blockage against the rest of the world.


2. Concept of TPP is even dangerous:

This reminds me of the condition before WWII before 1939, when protectionism prevailed.

TPP is dangerous in two-folds.

First, TPP works like protectionism for the rest of the world.

Second, TPP will become monopolistic power since it could represent almost 40% of economic power depending on contents of members, though.

In other words, the rest of the world will suffer at the gains of TPP members, which may lead to bankruptcy of Greece, for example, and may cause world depression.

In my opinion, Greece got one-time gains when becoming a member of EC such as appreciation of its currency as much as by three-folds due mainly to increased credibility backed up by EC.

However, in true economic sense, currency appreciation should occur based on increased competitiveness of the country, for example, which is sustainable, which is not the case for Greece.

Since competitive edge of Greece has not been increased while only living standards got raised up because of one-time wind fall gains, situation of Greece will get worse until Greece people start being aware of it and start working longer and harder.

Because of globalization factor, people of developed countries need to work harder and longer in order to compete against workers in developing countries those who work hard and long hours under less paid conditions.


IV. Warning and My Proposal:

Do not implement TPP for a while.

In other words, freeze TPP for 5 to ten years, and go directly to globalization or global government, or global society.

Although, movement of TPP is an inevitable or a reasonable step toward globalization, it should be best for us to skip this stage since it is a one step backward from globalization and will work as protectionism for the rest of the world.

I hope that my intention of trying to prevent unnecessary sufferings or financial pains is well acknowledged and implemented by the leaders of the world accordingly.


Hiroshi Morita, a citizen of global world.
December 28th, 2011.
コメント   トラックバック (1)
この記事をはてなブックマークに追加

菅総理は国益のために早く退陣してください。

2011-07-26 17:05:04 | Weblog
菅総理は早く退陣してください。


一度やめるといった人に新しい話を持ちかける人は誰もいません。


つまり、一度やめるといった菅総理に海外から新しい話を持ちかけられることはないということです。


したがって、菅総理がやっている限り、日本丸は漂流するだけで、前進しないということです。


一国の総理たるもの、私利私欲を捨てて、国益を重視すべきである。


一度やめるといった菅総理が総理を務めている限り、震災の事後処理はできても、海外との交易で成り立っている日本経済の進展は期待できない。


ゆえに、引きつき期間の約一カ月間を残し、8月31日までに退陣すべきである!


アメリカだって、日本と将来の話ができなくて困っていると思います。




コメント (2)
この記事をはてなブックマークに追加