本篇英国essay代写范文-Christianity and Confucianism in Chinese history originates讲了不同的学者对基督教与儒家思想的相互作用有不同的看法。更具体地说，上帝的观念和献祭的观点表明，中国历史上第一次深层次融合和基督教与儒家思想的冲突源于这两种宗教对“上帝”和“牺牲”。详细的情况是，一方面，一批以利玛窦为代表的人士认为，孔子学院倡导的五经典中的“神”，“天”和“圣”都可以用来解释上帝在基督教中的观念。本篇英国essay代写由51due英国代写平台整理，供大家参考阅读。
It can be easily found that different scholars have different ideas toward the interaction between Christianity and Confucianism. To put it more specifically, Conception of God and View of Offering Sacrifice indicates that the first deep fusion and serious conflict of Christianity and Confucianism in Chinese history originates from the similarities and differences in the opinions of those two religions toward both “God” and “sacrifice”. The detailed case is that on one hand, a group of people with Matteo Ricci as representative hold that “God”, “Heaven” and “Saint” in Five Classics advocated by the Confucian School can be used to interpret the idea of God in Christianity (Matteo Ricci. 2001). And this group of people insists that the expression of gratitude, respect and remembrance toward three virtues and three sacrifices in Confucianism is the same as trinity in Christianity. The aforementioned three virtues are the containing of heaven and earth, the education of saints and the birth and nurturing of ancestors and three sacrifices are respectively heaven and earth, Confucius together with ancestors. However, on the other hand, another group of people with Nicholas Longobardi as representative disagrees with that the similarities of Christianity and Confucianism and they put forward that those two different religions have different degrees of understanding toward their own proposals even if they both have three kinds of sacrifice.
Moreover, Hong Xiuquan and Sun Zhongshan have different application forms of Christianity and Confucianism. Detailed speaking, Hong Xiuquan and Sun Zhongshan are modern Chinese democratic revolution leaders so that they both arm people with thoughts from Christianity and Confucianism, hoping that they can update the old to the new. Hong Xiuquan, born on Jan. 1st, 1814 and died on June 1st, 1864, was one that had absorbed the equal thoughts of early Christian doctrines but his thoughts were greatly influenced by feudal ideology at the same time. Later, he had led the Taiping Movement which had swept over half of China so as to exert profound impacts toward the Qing dynasty and even the entire modern history. As for Hong Xiuquan, he focuses on Christianity as the packaging of folk religion and autocracy while contents about folk religion and autocracy are still old as a matter of fact (Xiuquan, Hong. 1985).
When it comes to Sun Zhongshan, he was born in 1866 and died in 1925 that had been regarded as a great democratic revolution forerunner of China in modern times. He is the first one to heave the banners of thorough feudalism so as to drive people to rebel against feudalism at that time. In addition, he places high emphasis on Confucianism to accommodate with Three Principles of the People and “knowing difficulty and acting easily” (Zhongshan, Sun. 1981-1986). From this, we can have a fair knowledge that what Sun Zhongshan proposes is new information though he bases new information on traditional Confucianism. It can be easily predicted that the difference between Hong Xiuquan and Sun Zhongshan is that Hong Xiuquan packages old information with new Christianity while Sun Zhongshan puts forward with new information based on traditional Confucianism.
Then what follows will be the comparison of Doctrine of Original Sin and Doctrine of Good Human Nature. In this case, Doctrine of Original Sin is what has circulated in Christianity among European countries and Doctrine of Good Human Nature is the nuclear concept of Confucianism in China. As a matter of fact, Doctrine of Original Sin and Doctrine of Good Human Nature are two reverse illustrating theories toward human nature and their basic difference lies in their starting point. Doctrine of Original Sin is god-based and it aims to show the love and favor of God while Doctrine of Good Human Nature is people-oriented which emphasizes the love of human beings whose significance is benevolence and righteousness. As a result, Doctrine of Original Sin brings out a set of heteronomous ethics during the process of divine love saving people from original sin. While Doctrine of Good Human Nature derives a set of self-discipline ethics out of the whole process of the love of human nature leading good deeds. If we take a philosophical point of view, we can say that Doctrine of Original Sin is one kind of theological ethics and Doctrine of Good Human Nature can be deemed as moral theology.
With the comparison of Doctrine of Original Sin and Doctrine of Good Human Nature being stated at length in the above, what will be compared next are Concept of Afterlife and View of Present Life. Concept of Afterlife and View of Present Life are believed to be the evitable problems that all religions have to face if they would like to tackle all the issues that will matter people’s settling down in real life. There is no doubt that Christianity and Confucianism are also included within. Basically, Christianity priors Concept of Afterlife and it hopes to pursue the complete liberation of individual spirit via the power of religion. But what has to be pointed out is that Christians are also required to deal with problems in present life properly. Talking about Confucianism, it lays higher significance on View of Present Life and it is determined to achieve full success of the crowd due to the work of education. Accordingly, Confucians will also take the issue of future generations into account. According to this, Christianity and Confucianism both cares about afterlife and present life and their difference is their different emphasis on afterlife and present life and their different root when choosing between afterlife and present life.
Speaking of the interaction between Christianity and Confucianism, it can not be hard to find that the existence of Christianity has also benefited more or less toward the improvement of Confucianism, Kang Youwei and Tan Sitong being two typical characters of better promoting the spirit of Confucianism when confronted with Christianity. These two people take Confucianism as the body and Christianity as assistance and they have raised the thoughts of “Datong” and “benevolence” staring from Confucianism. They two have updated the philosophical connotations of traditional Confucianism so that Confucianism is able to survive in a broader cultural background and a higher theoretical platform.
To sum up, what is new in my argument is that I have paid attention to the mutual benefits between Christianity and Confucianism while many previous scholars emphasize more on the differences between Christianity and Confucianism.
要想成绩好，英国论文得写好，51due英国代写平台为你提供英国留学资讯，专业辅导，还为你提供专业英国essay代写，paper代写，report代写，需要找论文代写的话快来联系我们51due吧。—Ace
It can be easily found that different scholars have different ideas toward the interaction between Christianity and Confucianism. To put it more specifically, Conception of God and View of Offering Sacrifice indicates that the first deep fusion and serious conflict of Christianity and Confucianism in Chinese history originates from the similarities and differences in the opinions of those two religions toward both “God” and “sacrifice”. The detailed case is that on one hand, a group of people with Matteo Ricci as representative hold that “God”, “Heaven” and “Saint” in Five Classics advocated by the Confucian School can be used to interpret the idea of God in Christianity (Matteo Ricci. 2001). And this group of people insists that the expression of gratitude, respect and remembrance toward three virtues and three sacrifices in Confucianism is the same as trinity in Christianity. The aforementioned three virtues are the containing of heaven and earth, the education of saints and the birth and nurturing of ancestors and three sacrifices are respectively heaven and earth, Confucius together with ancestors. However, on the other hand, another group of people with Nicholas Longobardi as representative disagrees with that the similarities of Christianity and Confucianism and they put forward that those two different religions have different degrees of understanding toward their own proposals even if they both have three kinds of sacrifice.
Moreover, Hong Xiuquan and Sun Zhongshan have different application forms of Christianity and Confucianism. Detailed speaking, Hong Xiuquan and Sun Zhongshan are modern Chinese democratic revolution leaders so that they both arm people with thoughts from Christianity and Confucianism, hoping that they can update the old to the new. Hong Xiuquan, born on Jan. 1st, 1814 and died on June 1st, 1864, was one that had absorbed the equal thoughts of early Christian doctrines but his thoughts were greatly influenced by feudal ideology at the same time. Later, he had led the Taiping Movement which had swept over half of China so as to exert profound impacts toward the Qing dynasty and even the entire modern history. As for Hong Xiuquan, he focuses on Christianity as the packaging of folk religion and autocracy while contents about folk religion and autocracy are still old as a matter of fact (Xiuquan, Hong. 1985).
When it comes to Sun Zhongshan, he was born in 1866 and died in 1925 that had been regarded as a great democratic revolution forerunner of China in modern times. He is the first one to heave the banners of thorough feudalism so as to drive people to rebel against feudalism at that time. In addition, he places high emphasis on Confucianism to accommodate with Three Principles of the People and “knowing difficulty and acting easily” (Zhongshan, Sun. 1981-1986). From this, we can have a fair knowledge that what Sun Zhongshan proposes is new information though he bases new information on traditional Confucianism. It can be easily predicted that the difference between Hong Xiuquan and Sun Zhongshan is that Hong Xiuquan packages old information with new Christianity while Sun Zhongshan puts forward with new information based on traditional Confucianism.
Then what follows will be the comparison of Doctrine of Original Sin and Doctrine of Good Human Nature. In this case, Doctrine of Original Sin is what has circulated in Christianity among European countries and Doctrine of Good Human Nature is the nuclear concept of Confucianism in China. As a matter of fact, Doctrine of Original Sin and Doctrine of Good Human Nature are two reverse illustrating theories toward human nature and their basic difference lies in their starting point. Doctrine of Original Sin is god-based and it aims to show the love and favor of God while Doctrine of Good Human Nature is people-oriented which emphasizes the love of human beings whose significance is benevolence and righteousness. As a result, Doctrine of Original Sin brings out a set of heteronomous ethics during the process of divine love saving people from original sin. While Doctrine of Good Human Nature derives a set of self-discipline ethics out of the whole process of the love of human nature leading good deeds. If we take a philosophical point of view, we can say that Doctrine of Original Sin is one kind of theological ethics and Doctrine of Good Human Nature can be deemed as moral theology.
With the comparison of Doctrine of Original Sin and Doctrine of Good Human Nature being stated at length in the above, what will be compared next are Concept of Afterlife and View of Present Life. Concept of Afterlife and View of Present Life are believed to be the evitable problems that all religions have to face if they would like to tackle all the issues that will matter people’s settling down in real life. There is no doubt that Christianity and Confucianism are also included within. Basically, Christianity priors Concept of Afterlife and it hopes to pursue the complete liberation of individual spirit via the power of religion. But what has to be pointed out is that Christians are also required to deal with problems in present life properly. Talking about Confucianism, it lays higher significance on View of Present Life and it is determined to achieve full success of the crowd due to the work of education. Accordingly, Confucians will also take the issue of future generations into account. According to this, Christianity and Confucianism both cares about afterlife and present life and their difference is their different emphasis on afterlife and present life and their different root when choosing between afterlife and present life.
Speaking of the interaction between Christianity and Confucianism, it can not be hard to find that the existence of Christianity has also benefited more or less toward the improvement of Confucianism, Kang Youwei and Tan Sitong being two typical characters of better promoting the spirit of Confucianism when confronted with Christianity. These two people take Confucianism as the body and Christianity as assistance and they have raised the thoughts of “Datong” and “benevolence” staring from Confucianism. They two have updated the philosophical connotations of traditional Confucianism so that Confucianism is able to survive in a broader cultural background and a higher theoretical platform.
To sum up, what is new in my argument is that I have paid attention to the mutual benefits between Christianity and Confucianism while many previous scholars emphasize more on the differences between Christianity and Confucianism.
要想成绩好，英国论文得写好，51due英国代写平台为你提供英国留学资讯，专业辅导，还为你提供专业英国essay代写，paper代写，report代写，需要找论文代写的话快来联系我们51due吧。—Ace
※コメント投稿者のブログIDはブログ作成者のみに通知されます