Everything comes from preceding of colonialization. Africa was under substantial colonialization.
The idea of the colonization infiltrated by having taken the Western Europe thought though Japan was not experiencing the colonization. The history of the invasion appeared there.
The substantial technique for learning from the colonization remained as an experience though Africa was liberated from the colonization. It can be said that it was pressed that you may not know. Colonialization did the early existence to the Darfur problem. It is guessed that it became a tragedy as the noninterference in internal affairs policy of China (resource principle) mixed it there.
The noninterference in internal affairs of China is peculiar if it makes it to the democracy that the Europe and America society thinks about.
It is because there is two rule sociologies there.
A present competing policy can still be progressed only under an old concept like a vertical, integrated model and the horizontal division of labor type model, etc.The directionality of mobile industry cannot be discussed for that.
The laboratory management is pushed in in an old frame of efficiency and even goes back.
Own uniqueness was understood only after the test research was applied to the frame of efficiency.
Lloyd historically reflects the science of Greece and the science of China.
The concept of intellectual property right with the present age is developed, and it contradicts, and the discussion from which the problem of the inspection and the problem of hacking are dug down very deeply is developed.
Richer diversity can be considered from a critical monism if it is not thought that a socialist problem is colonial rule.
Sharing sense of values is information and an education. If the same sense of values is unhappy, Europe and America, Japan, and China become both. There is a problem whether the intelligence sharing and sense of values return all in the problem of the inspection there.
If the value feeling is shared, pollution can be prevented. It can know harmful.
It shows that it is what the people should share in the literary property and noninterference in internal affairs. Democracy is that everyone can access it. In that sense, there is not a difference in Europe and America and China in thought either. You dare do not to have to develop by the dualism.
Becoming the problem here is whether recognizing harmful or excluding harmful becomes future tasks.
Diversity is weak existence to which directionality can be slightly acquired by being criticized because it is harmful, and being excluded.
参考文献 「古代の世界 現代の省察」 Ｇ・Ｅ・Ｒ・ロイド著
「研究所経営」 倉田健児・河尻耕太郎編著
「モバイル産業論」 川濱昇／大橋弘／玉田康成編
The idea of the colonization infiltrated by having taken the Western Europe thought though Japan was not experiencing the colonization. The history of the invasion appeared there.
The substantial technique for learning from the colonization remained as an experience though Africa was liberated from the colonization. It can be said that it was pressed that you may not know. Colonialization did the early existence to the Darfur problem. It is guessed that it became a tragedy as the noninterference in internal affairs policy of China (resource principle) mixed it there.
The noninterference in internal affairs of China is peculiar if it makes it to the democracy that the Europe and America society thinks about.
It is because there is two rule sociologies there.
A present competing policy can still be progressed only under an old concept like a vertical, integrated model and the horizontal division of labor type model, etc.The directionality of mobile industry cannot be discussed for that.
The laboratory management is pushed in in an old frame of efficiency and even goes back.
Own uniqueness was understood only after the test research was applied to the frame of efficiency.
Lloyd historically reflects the science of Greece and the science of China.
The concept of intellectual property right with the present age is developed, and it contradicts, and the discussion from which the problem of the inspection and the problem of hacking are dug down very deeply is developed.
Richer diversity can be considered from a critical monism if it is not thought that a socialist problem is colonial rule.
Sharing sense of values is information and an education. If the same sense of values is unhappy, Europe and America, Japan, and China become both. There is a problem whether the intelligence sharing and sense of values return all in the problem of the inspection there.
If the value feeling is shared, pollution can be prevented. It can know harmful.
It shows that it is what the people should share in the literary property and noninterference in internal affairs. Democracy is that everyone can access it. In that sense, there is not a difference in Europe and America and China in thought either. You dare do not to have to develop by the dualism.
Becoming the problem here is whether recognizing harmful or excluding harmful becomes future tasks.
Diversity is weak existence to which directionality can be slightly acquired by being criticized because it is harmful, and being excluded.
参考文献 「古代の世界 現代の省察」 Ｇ・Ｅ・Ｒ・ロイド著
「研究所経営」 倉田健児・河尻耕太郎編著
「モバイル産業論」 川濱昇／大橋弘／玉田康成編